Most
individual symptoms and signs have limited utility in determining the
likelihood of OSA, and no one sign is sufficiently precise to rule in
or rule out this condition. Although the absence of snoring makes a
diagnosis of OSA less likely, snoring on its own is common and does
not discriminate between those with and without OSA. Thus,
snoring must be interpreted in the context of other symptoms and signs. Likewise,
self-reported sleepinessandmorning headaches do not help
discriminate among patients with and without OSA. It is
somewhat surprising that the overall impression of sleep medicine
physicians of the likelihood of OSA in individual patients does not
perform much better than the limited utility of individual findings.
It is important to recognize that persons with normal body weight who
do not snore are unlikely to have OSA, and their complaints of daytime
sleepiness or fatigue should prompt an evaluation for
alternative diagnoses.
Although
the evidence shows that a number of recently published multi-itemed
questionnaires may help rule out OSA, they are not helpful
in identifying patients affected by sleep apnea. Fortunately, it appears
that an explicit combination of only a few findings, expressed
as the SACS, has promise for identifying patients most likely
to have OSA. Although the test is seemingly easy to use, validation
at current diagnostic thresholds in more general populations by primary
care clinicians would provide important evidence to justify
its use in routine screening.
No comments:
Post a Comment